Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 150 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 150 Next Page
Page Background

23

Forty years ago, the majority of rich Europe-

an countries were satisfied with how material

living standards in their societies were distrib-

uted. Of course inequality still did exist and

many groups of the population did not yet en-

joy their fair share of the increasing national

prosperity but there was optimism that society

would get ever closer to “prosperity for all”.

The poorer countries on the southern fringes of

Europe, as well as Ireland, saw themselves on

the way towards emulating their richer neigh-

bours. The people in the eastern countries

dreamed of introducing western prosperity into

their egalitarian distribution structures.

Things turned out very differently. Several of

the richer societies (but not all) experienced dra-

matic increases in both inequality and poverty.

The poorer countries stayed the course regard-

ing per capita income but there was no signifi-

cant decrease in inequality and during the last

two decades some areas even saw dramatic in-

creases, along with rising poverty rates. In east-

ern parts of Central Europe, after the transition

of 1989/90, a definite trend towards social po-

larisation emerged, despite the fact that a num-

ber of these countries are still relatively egalitar-

ian today when compared to the rest of Europe.

Some key figures:

In the EU of fifteen, i.e. before the large

wave of eastern expansion, from the period

stretching between 1995 and the 2008 crisis,

seven out of the ten deciles of income distribu-

tion saw their average disposable income in-

crease by between 1.22% and 1.28% each

year. For the richest decile, however, it increased

by 2.26% each year and for the poorest by

1.06%. For the second richest this figure was

1.31%. Across a plethora of countries, the in-

crease in inequality occurred on a dramatic

scale. In Germany, the disposable income for

the top decile increased by 1.32% each year,

multiple times greater than the increase in all

other deciles. The poorest tenth registered an

annual decline in income of 0.14% over the 15-

year period, the second poorest by 0.2% and

the third poorest still by 0.03%. In the Nether-

lands these figures were -0.27% for the poorest

and +2.44% for the richest, whilst the lower

middle classes experienced a greater increase

than the upper middle classes. In the UK as well

as the more egalitarian Nordic countries the

poorest decile lagged significantly behind the

rest whilst the richest decile was well above av-

erage. Other patterns, however, emerged too.

In France, as in the majority of Member States,

Inequality in Europe in the

early 21st century

Alfred Pfaller