Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  125 / 145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 125 / 145 Next Page
Page Background

BREXIT: THE LAST CHANCE FOR EUROPE AND THE UNITED KINGDOM?

125

reopen the debate about joining the euro. The

priorities for British pro-Europeans are the

completion of the Single Market to strengthen

productivity in different economic sectors and

to promote European competitiveness, the crea-

tion of the Capital Markets Union, the conclu-

sion of trade negotiations with the United States

(TTIP), China and Japan, the reduction of excess

regulation and red tape, and the strengthening

of foreign policy and shared security. Other pri-

orities include the reform and partial repatria-

tion of regional policy (structural funds and CAP

reform) to make it more streamlined and green-

er, and a desire to slim down EU institutions and

government, all of which combine with contin-

uing mistrust of the European social dimension.

British pro-Europeans and Eurosceptics share

a number of goals, some of which differ starkly

from the aspirations of their counterparts on

the Continent or even certain objectives that

have already been achieved. Thus, anything re-

lated to political union and the progressive

strengthening of the democratic legitimacy of

EU institutions is to be contested. Similarly, any-

thing that might weaken or dilute the commu-

nity’s intergovernmental decision-making pro-

cess is criticised and opposed, even by British

pro-Europeans, a good example being the

transfer of power to allow the European

Parliament to elect the president of the European

Commission. Both attitudes aim to preserve the

powers of the European Council and strengthen

the role of national parliaments (and not exactly

in the way set out in the Lisbon Treaty).

In short, pro-European sentiments in the UK

do not map directly onto equivalent views on

the Continent. Debates and reflections take

place in an extremely different environment,

one that is highly pragmatic and almost exclu-

sively focused on the economic dimension of

the EU and its role in the world, without room

for political union. British pro-EU sentiment

leads to clear contradictions: on the one hand,

it is against opt-outs, yet its failure to back pro-

gress in political union, a key factor in the de-

bate regarding “ever closer union”, makes it

impossible to avoid having recourse to new opt-

outs in the future, in spite of their unpopularity

among British supporters of the EU.

Immigration

EU immigrants contribute to the UK’s economic

and cultural wealth, as is also true of immigrants

from many non-EU countries. The debate often

overlooks the other side of freedom of move-

ment in the EU: approximately 1 million British

citizens living in Spain, 330,000 in France,

330,000 in Ireland and 65,000 in Cyprus, ac-

cording to 2015 figures. The level of activity, oc-

cupation, entrepreneurship and education

among this group is higher than the average for

the British population as a whole, while they

place less burden on the welfare state and the

benefits system (although there are clear differ-

ences between immigrants from France, Italy

and Spain, and those who come from eastern

Europe).

Reforming the EU, the Eurozone

and the pound

One of the main arguments used by British

Eurosceptics is that the crisis affecting the euro

makes the EU less attractive for a UK that is at-

tached to the pound. Similarly, the possibility of

the Eurozone countries making progress toward

political union, electing a finance minister, har-

monising their tax systems and adopting a uni-

fied position with respect to major international