Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  39 / 150 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 150 Next Page
Page Background

UPDATING THE EU’S ENERGY AND CLIMATE POLICY. THE NEW 2030 FRAMEWORK AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

39

assumed the role of steering the climate policy

side of things in a certain direction, it continued

to leave the implementation of measures in the

area of renewable support mechanisms up to

the Member States. The Renewables Directive

sets national targets to be reached by 2020

without deciding on the mechanisms to achieve

them. The individual Member States’ targets

were determined on the basis of the respective

stage of development of their renewable energy

sector in 2005 and their economic performance

at the time. As a consequence, the targets

ranged from 10% for Malta to 49% for Sweden.

The targets of individual Member States have

been set as a percentage of their final energy

consumption. Member States can decide for

themselves which exact percentage of renewa-

ble energy sources to strive for in their electric-

ity, heating/cooling, and transportation sectors,

as long as the overall target is fulfilled. The

transportation sector is the only sector to have

been assigned a specific minimum target of

10% by 2020 that must be achieved by all

Member States.

Member States must provide the Commission

with annual reports on the state of develop-

ment and any political measures that have been

or are being carried out in the renewable energy

sector. The first round of national action plans

for the year 2011 painted a very positive pic-

ture. With the exception of only a few Member

States, the goals were considered likely to be

achieved (European Commission, 2011a and

2012b). Since the summer of 2012, however,

signs have demonstrated that these positive

prognoses can no longer be kept (cf. Fischer/

Westphal, 2012). The latest progress report in

March 2013 confirmed a more doubtful out-

look (c.f. European Commission 2013b). This

has mostly been due to two independent devel-

opments:

1) In the transportation sector, which accounts

for roughly one third of energy consumption

in the EU, biofuels were supposed to make a

major contribution to achieving the renew-

able energy goal. The sub-target of deriving

10% of the energy used in the transport sec-

tor from renewable energy sources was

meant to create a Europe-wide market for

biofuels, while at the same time promoting

the development of new technologies, such

as electrically powered cars or second-gener-

ation biofuels that no longer pose a threat to

food production. Even before the directive

was passed in 2009, critical voices were

raised, advising against political support

measures in favor of biofuels and question-

ing the sustainability of this development.

Meanwhile, the (sometimes exaggerated)

“food vs. fuel” conflict, i.e. the competition

between fuel and food production, had a

disastrous effect on the reputation of the

biofuel industry. If the 10% goal in the trans-

port sector is abandoned, the overall objec-

tive of raising the share of renewables to

20% as a percentage of final energy con-

sumption would be jeopardized as well.

2) In the course of the global financial, eco-

nomic, and debt crisis, many Member States

have significantly cut the amount of finan-

cial support used to promote the spread of

renewable energies. Particularly in the crisis-

torn nations of Spain, Portugal and Greece,

renewable energy subsidies have fallen vic-

tim to fiscal consolidation. In addition, a

number of Central and Eastern European

states have curtailed their renewable energy

support schemes. In this context, some of

these cuts were implemented retroactively,

thus not only reducing funds for future pro-

jects, but also cutting promised support for

facilities that have already been installed,