THE STATE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
94
and Visa Facilitation Agreements, which came
into force in December of that year. Nigeria’s
relationship with the EU with regard to migra-
tion issues dates to April 2008, when an EU mi-
gration mission visited the country. Since then
there have been six dialogue meetings at a local
level on migration and development which have
led to the EU presenting a draft Common
Agenda on Migration and Mobility to the
Nigerian authorities in October 2013. At pre-
sent a suitable date for the signing of this
Agreement is currently being arranged. Finally,
South Africa and the EU began a Strategic
Association in 2007. Since then, within the
framework of the Mixed Cooperation Council
established between them, the two parties have
organized a Dialogue Forum on Migration.
Managing a collateral phenomenon
of migratory movements: jihadism
In recent months, migratory movements around
the Mediterranean, both from south to north
and from north to south, have been at the centre
of a new phenomenon that makes the process of
managing such movements more complex and
challenging. The journeys of European citizens,
many although not all of them from North
African or Muslim backgrounds, to countries
with a strong Al-Qaeda or DAESH presence –
particularly Syria, Iraq and Yemen – and their re-
turn, heavily radicalized, to their countries of ori-
gin, constitute a major challenge to those seeking
to manage flows of migrants between countries
on both shores of the Mediterranean, and are an
indisputable threat to the security of the EU.
The terrible attacks in Paris in January this
year against satirical magazine
Charlie Hebdo
and against a kosher supermarket, in which 17
people died at the hands of terrorists who had
travelled to Syria and Yemen before returning to
France to perpetrate these acts, has reopened
debate about measures to monitor and control
travellers going to and returning from countries
such as Syria, Yemen, Libya and Iraq. The added
complication arises from the fact that, in order
to reach their destinations, many people travel
by alternative routes. For example, those travel-
ling to Syria to join DAESH first make their way
to Istanbul before crossing the Turkish border.
This was the case of Hayat Boumeddiene, the
wife of Amedy Coulibaly, one of the Paris terror-
ists, who drove to Madrid with him before
catching a flight from Madrid to Istanbul on 2
January, while her husband returned to Paris to
take part in the attacks. However, the solution
lies not in restricting freedom of movement but
in improving the mechanisms for sharing infor-
mation and sharing data between security forc-
es and intelligence services, making it possible
to fight terrorism effectively at the European
level. At the same time, there is the question of
how to deal with people who frequently consult
jihadist websites and how to prosecute for ter-
rorism offences those who travel to conflict
zones to join a violent group. Here, the chal-
lenge is how to guarantee security without dam-
aging our freedom. Another complex and con-
troversial issue is the Passenger Name Record
(PNR). In the European Parliament, several peo-
ple have indicated the need to establish limits on
the information contained in this record and the
filters applied, to prevent the establishment of
discriminatory criteria based on the origin or
name of passengers. The President of the
Commission, Donald Tusk, has stated
6
that he
will put pressure on the European Parliament to
reduce its opposition to the proposed European
6
Reference 5.