THE FIGHT AGAINST TAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE: TOWARDS A HARMONISATION OF CORPORATE INCOME TAXES WITHIN THE EU
87
intention of renouncing this “privilege” until the
European Commission convinces five neighbour-
ing jurisdictions (Switzerland, SanMarino, Monaco,
Liechtenstein and Andorra) to make similar com-
mitments. During the same period, Switzerland set
about forging bilateral agreements with major
European countries
21
in an attempt to undermine
the effectiveness of the EUSTD.
European countries continued on this path
of vacillation until the implementation of the US
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA
22
)
got underway, at which point five major
European countries (the G5) not only adopted
one of the models of implementation contem-
plated in FATCA, but also decided to share
amongst themselves the same types of informa-
tion they would be exchanging going forward
with the United States. Other countries within
and beyond the EU quickly followed suit in a
wave of enthusiasm that led to the long-await-
ed revision of the EUSTD by the European
Council, which entered into effect in March
2014. In November of the same year, G20 lead-
ers ratified the OECD’s new global standard on
automatic information exchange, which bor-
rowed elements from both FATCA and the EU
Directives. The OECD’s Global Forum on
Transparency and Exchange of Information for
Tax Purposes will monitor for the application of
the new automatic sharing standards through
its peer review programme.
21
One such treaty was signed by Switzerland and the Unit-
ed Kingdom.
22
FATCA was enacted to curb tax abuses committed by US
taxpayers who hold assets in offshore accounts. The novelty
of this law the 30% withholding tax it imposes on foreign
financial institutions that refuse to sign disclosure agree-
ments with the US Internal Revenue Service to identify and
provide information regarding US accounts. This law, which
was ratified by the US Congress in 2010, requires financial
institutions to implement account procedures to identify US
account holders as of July 2014.
The OCDE Standard envisages that financial
institutions will report a wide range of informa-
tion to tax authorities. It likewise envisages that
source countries will exchange this information
on a regular and automatic basis with the tax
authorities of countries of residence. At the re-
cent OECD Global Forum meeting in Berlin, fif-
ty-one jurisdictions signed a multilateral compe-
tent authority agreement to automatically
exchange information as per the new OECD
Standard based on the Convention on Mutual
Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters
23
. It is
interesting to note that the United States has
not, to date, become a signatory to this agree-
ment.
Synergies between the EU and the OECD
were further strengthened at the ECOFIN meet-
ing held in December 2014 with the amend-
ment of another piece of key community legis-
lation related to taxation, Directive 2011/16/UE
on administrative cooperation in the field of
taxation. This document complements the
EUSTD by requiring AEOI for revenues other
than interest on savings. By extending AEOI to
items such as dividends, and capital gains, the
EU has met, and on certain points, surpassed,
the levels of transparency covered by OECD
standards.
23
Although it was forged between the OECD and the Eu-
ropean Council, participation in this convention is open to
developing countries and countries currently serving as tax
havens around the world.