Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  137 / 150 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 150 Next Page
Page Background

RECOMMENDATIONS

137

– The European Semester reports must be modified to include social

indicators, with the aim of implementing counter-cyclical policies to

generate economic activity and to fund active employment policies.

Such policies have suffered from funding cuts since 2008, despite the

increase in unemployment as a result of austerity policies.

– European economic and monetary union should be complemented by

the formal launch of a European employment policy, one that would

not only generate jobs and promote investment but would also include

other measures such as the creation of a European element of national

unemployment benefits, helping those countries hardest hit by the

crisis to retrain their unemployed people, a strengthening of the European

Social Fund (ESF) for the long-term unemployed, and the creation of a

European minimum wage framework, taking into account the cost of

living and average salary in each member state to guarantee all workers

a living wage.

4. Protection of refugees

– Solidarity should be strengthened in this field, with the creation of a

European Fund to support refugees.

– Legal access routes should be expanded: humanitarian welcome

programmes, humanitarian visas and temporary protection schemes

must be accompanied by normal mobility mechanisms such as reuniting

families, employment mobility and mobility for students, along with

evacuation procedures for medical reasons. At the same time, these

measures must be designed in ways that prevent their manipulation by

people traffickers, and must include safeguards against exploitation in

recipient countries.

– Within the EU, a thorough-going revision of the directives and

regulations of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) still needs

to be negotiated. Faced with a high volume of refugees, the Dublin

system has been found wanting and has failed to ensure that EU

member states comply with their responsibility to protect refugees.

Despite this failure, current plans for Dublin IV retain the existing

principle that asylum seekers must be accommodated by the country

of first arrival. The European Parliament and the Council still have the

option of aligning cooperation between countries of arrival and transit,

controlling external borders, and rules within the European Union,

based on the consistent evaluation and monitoring of human rights.