Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 / 150 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 150 Next Page
Page Background

EU 2016: ANOTHER STEP TO BEING AN IMPORTANT GLOBAL POWER

69

countries and societies to the east of the EU into

Central Asia and to the south of the EU to

Central Africa. The Strategy places the acces-

sion process of the eastern candidates and

Turkey in that framework. The construction of

security in the European neighbourhood is a

goal of the Union, then.

The third priority of the Strategy is the inte-

grated approach to conflicts. It specifically

points to the cases of Syria and Libya, in which

the dimensions to be addressed are local, na-

tional, regional, and global.

The fourth priority is support for cooperative

regional orders in Europe, of course, but also in

the Mediterranean, in the Middle East and Africa,

across the Atlantic, in Asia and in the Artic.

Lastly, the Strategy advocates a Global

Governance for the 21

st

century in which the EU

champions a strong United Nations as the bed-

rock of the order based on the rules of interna-

tional law.

The EU’s foreign relations in 2016:

between tension and collaboration

Migrations and refugees mark national

agendas with Turkey as the central partner

Migratory movements were the key to explain-

ing the state of European public opinions and

many of the election results in 2016.

Undoubtedly, immigration was the most deci-

sive element for understanding the triumph of

the “leave” vote in the British referendum.

Many Britons chose to vote in favour of the

United Kingdom’s departure from the EU based

on what they believed to be a lack of control in

the free movement of people and in the entry of

immigrants into the country. Likewise, the rise

of far-right movements and populism across

Europe owes much to that perception. In all cer-

tainty, the Dutch elections in March 2017, the

French elections in May and the German elec-

tions in September will not escape a debate fo-

cused on that subject matter.

The European Union’s borders have been un-

der intense pressure since 2015, both because of

the arrival of refugees, essentially from Syria,

and because of the economic migrations across

the Mediterranean. That year, 2015, entries into

the Union hit the figure of 1.8 million. In 2016,

however, there was a significant drop, according

to Frontex figures, to 500,000 entries. United

Nations calculations produce the same data: a

reduction in entries of over 70 %. The drop was

largely due to the agreement reached between

the EU and Turkey in March 2016. The best ex-

ample is the number of entries through Greece,

which fell by up to 79 % from one year to the

next. The same can be seen in the entries via the

Balkans, with a fall of over 80 %. Despite the

reduction in the figures, they remain well above

those of the years prior to the refugee crisis.

However, given that the causes that give rise

to these population displacements continue –

instability and war in Syria and the Middle East

and lack of development in Africa –, the closure

of one migratory route leads to the opening of

another. Migratory flows across the central

Mediterranean, especially from Libya to Italy,

grew by 18 % between 2015 and 2016. Deaths

in the Mediterranean also increased by 38 %,

from 3,175 in 2015 to 4,400 in 2016. The na-

tionalities of those entering the EU did not

change. Syrians (88,000) and Afghans (50,000)

remained at the top of the list.

European public opinion is highly polarised

in the face of this situation. Angela Merkel suf-

fered a major drop in popularity largely because

of her favourable positions on taking in mi-

grants. The continuation of the conflict in Syria