Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 / 169 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 169 Next Page
Page Background

THE EU IN THE WAKE OF BREXIT. RESULTS OF A REPRESENTATIVE SURVEY CONDUCTED IN EIGHT EU COUNTRIES

69

called upon the Member States to show more

cohesion. Some countries, above all France and

Germany, have responded with a stronger reaf-

firmation of the EU. In this, they have the major-

ity of their respective populations on their side:

eight out of ten Germans and six out of ten

French are in favour of strengthening coopera-

tion. So are clear majorities in Spain, Italy and

Slovakia. Meanwhile, support is significantly

weaker in the Netherlands and Sweden. In the

Czech Republic, finally, more citizens are actu-

ally in favour of greater national autonomy than

more cooperation (47 to 40 %).

Basic attitudes towards the EU

In the autumn of 2015, as the refugee crisis was

unfolding, basic attitudes towards the EU were

rather sceptical: only somewhat more than one-

fourth (28 %) of citizens in the eight countries

surveyed believed that EU membership was to

the advantage of their country. One-third asso-

ciated it with disadvantages. Another consid-

ered advantages and disadvantages to be

roughly in balance. Attitudes in individual coun-

tries differed greatly, however. In five countries

– France, the Netherlands, Italy, Sweden and the

Czech Republic – a plurality of citizens assumed

negative effects. This sceptical attitude was par-

ticularly salient in the Czech Republic at 44 %,

where by comparison only 13 % saw net advan-

tages. In Slovakia, positive and negative views

on EU membership were roughly equal. Solely

the attitudes of Germans and – particularly –

Spaniards displayed more optimism than pessi-

mism back then.

In early 2017, only one and a half years later,

a completely different picture emerges: EU

membership is assessed as significantly more

positive. Across countries, the percentage of

optimists has risen from 28 to 44 %, with only

22 % now fearing disadvantages (2015: 34 %).

There may be a causal link between this mood

swing and Brexit. Until recently, access to the EU

seemed tantamount to membership with no

option to leave. Making membership seem

more precarious, Brexit has apparently led to a

more focused analysis of the pros and cons of

EU membership. In all eight countries, there has

been a significant increase in the share of fa-

vourable views. At present, six of the eight

countries consider membership as positive. This

was only the case in three countries in 2015.

Views differ considerably between individual

countries, however. Germans display the most

positive balance: here the percentage of opti-

mists has doubled from 34 to 64 % (

Chart 2

).

A comparably positive development has tak-

en place in Slovakia, where the share of mem-

bership supporters has surged from 26 to 52 %.

Attitudes in Spain, where six out of ten citizens

hold the view that the benefits of EU member-

ship outweigh the disadvantages, are even

more marked. The citizens of Sweden, the

Netherlands and France now also see signifi-

cantly greater advantages than disadvantages in

EU membership.

Discernible doubt remains in Italy, where

citizens see advantages and disadvantages on

even keel. Current ambiguity does not equal

fundamental rejection of EU membership as

such, however, as two-thirds of Italians call for a

strengthening of integration. The Czech

Republic is the only country that views member-

ship as rather disadvantageous. Yet even in this

country traditionally EU-skeptical, a slight shift

can be observed: the share of optimists has

doubled from 13 to 25 %.

There is a widespread image of the EU as an

elite project from which lower classes profit lit-

tle, resulting in these strata being indifferent to