Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 145 Next Page
Page Background

THE STATE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

20

and which is to be implemented by a College of

European Commissioners which draws 95 % of

its members from the ranks of MEPs.

In this respect, the operation of the EU clear-

ly benefits if the governments of its member

states, represented in the European Council,

consist of grand coalitions, coalitions or single

party governments led by parties belonging to

one of the three currents that provide Brussels

with its political leadership. However, this does

not mean that relationships are free of contra-

dictions and conflicts, given that national inter-

ests often play a part in EU decision-making,

which is not influenced solely by broad political

tendencies.

The left-right axis remains a major factor

There were eight general elections in the EU in

2015: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Po-

land, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.

So far, there have been two more during 2016,

in Ireland and Slovakia.

The left-right axis remains key to determin-

ing majorities and identifying the balance of

power within the European Council, and in

these terms four of the elections were won by

right-wing parties. These were the clear victory

of David Cameron’s Conservative Party in the

United Kingdom; the absolute majority ob-

tained by Poland’s ultra-conservative “Law and

Justice” party; the inclusion as a partner in the

centre-right coalition of the populist “True

Finns” in Finland following the vote of 19 April;

and Denmark, where liberal Lars Rasmussen be-

came Prime Minister with the support of the

populist Danish People’s Party.

In Estonia, last March’s elections returned

the outgoing coalition between the centre-right

and the social democrats to power.

At the other end of the European political

spectrum, two parties shifted to the left: Greece,

where Alexis Tsipras, leader of Syriza, is Prime

Minister; and Portugal, where socialist Antonio

Costa heads a single-party government, but one

that relies on the explicit support of the Left

Bloc and the Communist Party.

If Spain had a left-wing prime minister, the

current left/right balance within the EU would

be significantly altered. Excluding Spain, there

are twelve left-wing or centre-left prime minis-

ters compared to fifteen from the right or cen-

tre-right. Left-wing governments represent 42

% of the EU’s population, compared to 58 %

who are governed by the right. This percentage

would fall to 53 % if Spain were to be governed

by the left. If we include grand coalitions in our

calculations (those involving ministers both from

the left and the right) then the percentages

change. Excluding Spain, countries governed by

a grand coalition account for 33 % of the Euro-

pean population, those governed by the left

represent 36 %, and those ruled by the right are

31 %. If a left-wing government were formed

in Spain, the proportion of the European popu-

lation governed by this current would rise to 42

%, against a figure of only 28 % with conserva-

tive governments. Any change of government

in Spain is thus bound to have a significant im-

pact on the balance of power in Brussels.

In two countries which voted in 2016 –Ire-

land and Slovakia– governments have yet to be

formed, and the process of doing so promises to

be anything but straightforward.

In Ireland, the two parties that had governed

in coalition for the previous five years, the cen-

trist Fine Gael and the Labour Party, fell almost

30 seats short of an absolute majority. Although

Ireland’ GDP has risen faster than any other Eu-

rozone countries, both parties were severely

punished by voters for austerity measures and