Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  24 / 145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 145 Next Page
Page Background

THE STATE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

24

first two regions, it became the third-largest

party, while in Saxony-Anhalt it overtook the

SPD and claimed second place. This means

that AfD is represented in eight of Germa-

ny’s sixteen regional parliaments. These elec-

tions have produced political fragmentation

and polarisation, as a result of which the

formation of an administration in two of

these regions required the participation of

three parties.

– Austria: the Freedom Party (FPÖ) achieved its

best ever result in local elections in Vienna.

– Denmark: the Danish People’s Party become

the country’s second force at the general

elections, with 21.1 % of the vote.

– ����������������������������������������������

Spain: Podemos is the third-largest party fol-

lowing the general election of 20 December,

in which it was competing for the first time.

– France: the National Front won the first

round of the regional elections.

– Finland: the “True Finns” came third with

17.6 % of the vote in the general election in

2015, and entered government as a mem-

ber of the ruling coalition.

– ��������������������������������������������

Greece: Syriza won two general election vic-

tories, increasing its majority in the second

contest, held in September 2015.

– Hungary: the government of Viktor Orbán,

whose migration policies are supported by

the far-right party, Jobbik, has built a fence

to prevent the entrance of refugees and mi-

grants, and has blocked laws to recognise

gay marriage.

– ������� ���� ��������� ����� �������������� ���

Italy: the populist Five Star Movement be-

came the country’s second largest party in

regional elections.

– Poland: the Law and Justice Party (PiS) won

an absolute majority, the country’s first since

the fall of the Berlin Wall, and has taken de-

cisions that have led to the opening of a

commission assessment under the “new EU

framework to strengthen the rule of law”,

which, if this is shown to be threatened in

Poland, could lead to the application of Arti-

cle 7 of the Treaty of Lisbon.

– United Kingdom: UKIP won 12.6 % of the

vote at the general election.

– Slovakia: the People’s Party Our Slovakia

(LSNS), a far-right, anti-European, anti-NATO

party, won 8 % of the vote and entered par-

liament at the last election. In addition, anti-

system formations that represent a protest

vote took 30 % of the total votes cast.

In other words, populist discourse has met

with considerable backing from citizens at the

ballot box in a large number of EU member

states. However, it is important to distinguish

between different types of populism, both in

terms of the nature of these movements and

with regard to the policies they propose and the

effects if these were to be applied.

It seems clear that, in terms of rights and

democracy, it is the populism of the far right

that is of most concern, aimed as it is at the

heart of European values, starting with the prin-

ciple of non-discrimination.

While it is true that the presence of such par-

ties in countries such as Denmark and Finland is

of grave concern, the most drastic attacks on

freedom have been implemented by far-right

parties governing on their own. This is the case

of Hungary and Poland, aggravated in the for-

mer by the fact that the ruling FIDESZ party is

still a member of the European People’s Party,

something that ought to prompt some heart-

searching within this grouping with regard to its

apparent flexibility in admitting certain parties

on the basis that this will leave the EPP better

placed to exercise a moderating influence on

them.

Following the example of Orbán, who mod-

ified Hungary’s constitution, Poland’s Law and