Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  39 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

Iranian policy towards post-Saddam Iraq

37

state would be a bonanza for the Islamic Republic of Iran. However, it should be borne

in mind that such a region would directly border Iranian territory primarily inhabited by

marginalized ethnic Iranian Shia Arabs, who sit on the vast majority of Iran’s oil reserves.

Iranian law stipulates that a mere few percentage points of oil proceeds go directly back to

oil-producing regions. In the context of the history of destruction in this region during the

1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, and the Iranian government’s subsequent failure to fully pursue

investment, the emergence of an independent Arab Shia state awash in oil wealth is likely

to cause concerns in Tehran that on some levels touch the same nerves as an independent

Iraqi Kurdistan would.

Search for qualified stability

Discussion of Iranian interest in Iraq’s territorial integrity leads to the question of Iran’s

interest in qualified stability in Iraq. The term “qualified” is used here to explain what Iran

seeks by outlining what it does not seek.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has no interest in witnessing the emergence of an Iraqi

central government capable of constituting a direct threat to Iranian national security.

The 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war was the longest armed conflict since World War Two, costing

hundreds of thousands of lives and immense material damage. This conflict greatly shaped

the Islamic Republic, including its discourse, and continues to do so to this very day.

At the same time, Iran has a vital interest in preventing the emergence of breeding

grounds for the emergence of lesser, but also concerning, threats such as the Islamic State

in Iraq and Shaam [the Levant] (ISIS). In other words, while Tehran has no interest in a

formidable Iraqi state, it also has no interest in the Iraqi state being incapable of exercising

sovereignty in the most basic sense of the term: i.e. the state monopolizing violence. The

outcome of the dynamic between these two interests is directly linked to the aforementioned

discussion of Iranian views towards Iraqi territorial integrity. It is also highly relevant to the

formation of grander Iranian policy towards Iraq.

Expansion of Iran’s economic sphere

Lost in the debate on Iranian influence in Iraq, which overly focuses on sectarianism

and security considerations, is discussion of important economic interests.

Economics plays a considerable part in the shaping of Iranian views towards Iraq,

which is a multi-billion dollar market for Iranian goods and services. Beyond pursuit of

interdependence as a long-term approach to reduce the potential for conflict, economic

ties are viewed as a tool to leverage and diversify political influence. Over a decade after the

American-led overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Iran is Iraq’s second-largest non-oil

trading partner. Iran is only surpassed by Turkey in terms of Iraq’s non-oil trade with the

world. Importantly, the majority of this trade is carried out via territory controlled by the

landlocked KRG.

Beyond non-oil trade, Iraq’s energy sector holds great consequence for the Iranian

economy. Iraq possesses one of the world’s largest oil reserves, and despite continuous

instability and violence, has steadily developed its energy infrastructure over the past